The Apostle John
The Apostle John
The Apostle John was the younger brother of the Apostle James. In fact, John was said to be the youngest of the Apostles of Jesus. John was a very humble man, and whenever he speaks of himself in his Gospel, he refers to himself as ” that disciple whom Jesus loved.” He didn’t want to be so bold as to say “I did this…” or “I did that, and Jesus loved me best!” So whenever John spoke of himself, it was always by pointing to Jesus’ special love, and thus drawing attention away from himself. John 13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7,20, Reprint 4115
Much has already been mentioned about John in the previous chapter on his brother. His mother, Salome was the sister of Jesus’ mother. This would make John and James the cousins of Jesus. Also mentioned was the fact that John and James were sons of a successful fisherman named Zebedee. Tradition stated that their family was “well-to-do” and had “connections” and perhaps influence with the social and religious rulers of their day.
After the baptism of Jesus and his 40 days alone in the wilderness, Jesus walked past John the Baptist as he was preaching repentance to a crowd of Jews. John the Baptist exclaimed, “Behold the Lamb of God!” John, the son of Zebedee, and Andrew who were then disciples of John the Baptist, decided to quickly follow after Jesus. They quietly walked behind Jesus for quite a distance when Jesus turned to them saying, “What do you seek?” John and Andrew said, “Teacher, show us where you live.” John 1:36-39 Jesus showed them, and they stayed with him that day, learning of him.
This faithful, teachable spirit of John was a special blessing to Jesus. Like the Apostle Peter and John’s brother James, John became a close, loving friend of Jesus. Although John was this loving servant of the Lord, he and his brother James were nicknamed the “Sons of Thunder” when they sought to rebuke the Samaritans. Recall Mark 3:17, Luke 9: 54,55 & Reprint 1041
In addition to this incident about the Samaritans, Mark 9:38-40 confirms John’s firm spirit. John spoke out boldly to the Lord against a person who had been casting out devils in Jesus’ name. Jesus corrected him again by saying, “Forbid him not; for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me. For he that is not against us is on our part.” In other words, we are to show love to those who claim to have the Lord’s spirit whether they associate with us or not. Reprint 3747 John learned this lesson quickly, because he loved his Lord very much and desired to please him.
This and many other incidents showed Jesus’ special love and trust in his Apostle John. Along with Peter and James, John witnessed the raising of Jairus’ daughter, the transfiguration, and the agony of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. As mentioned in previous chapters, these three Apostles alone witnessed these very important events.
Another evidence of this special friendship was when Jesus sent Peter and John to prepare the Passover for Jesus and the twelve Apostles. Through this they witnessed yet another miracle of Jesus in Luke 22:8-13. Jesus told them to look for a man carrying a pitcher of water on his head, and this man would lead them to the room where they would eat the Passover together. This was unusual, because women were normally the ones to carry pitchers of water on their heads, not men. The miracle was that Jesus knew in advance that a man, at just the right time, would walk by carrying a pitcher of water on his head.
Even though John was called the dearest friend loved of Jesus, he experienced the same fear and confusion as the other Apostles in Jesus’ most trying hour. John didn’t stay to assist Jesus when the religious rulers arrested Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. Matt. 26:56 All of the Apostles “forsook him and fled.” This was probably out of a feeling of helplessness, because, up to this time, Jesus was able to escape any harm. Jesus warned them of this hour, and yet, they were not prepared for the prophecies to be fulfilled that pointed to Jesus’ death. John 16;32,33 and Matt 26;37-41 It wasn’t long after abandoning Jesus that John regained his courage. The Scriptures show how John used his “connections” with the religious rulers to gain entrance to the palace of the High Priest, Caiaphas. John and Peter were permitted to be in the courtyard of the High Priest where Peter denied the Lord three times. John 18:13-15
How John’s heart must have ached for his Lord. He must have wanted desperately to free his master. It might have been that John viewed from a distance the proceedings of Jesus’ journey bearing the heavy cross. And then, while John stood helplessly at the foot of his master’s cross, he heard Jesus say to Mary his mother, “Woman, behold thy son!” John 19:25-27 Jesus was so thoroughly trusting of his faithful Apostle, that he asked John to care for his mother. Jesus may have observed how his cousin John showed a special care and concern for Mary all through his life. And Mary must have known of Jesus’ great love and trust in John. So this would have been a special comfort to her as John held her close and cried together with her before the painful cross.

After Jesus had been placed in the tomb, Peter and John were told by Mary Magdalene that the stone had been rolled away from the entrance. As they raced to see for themselves, John outran Peter to the tomb. They both saw the burial clothes lying in the tomb, but Jesus’ body was gone. They then knew that Jesus had been resurrected. John 20:1-8 But they and the other Apostles still didn’t know why Jesus had to suffer and die.
Because of their disappointment at the death of Jesus, John and the other Apostles went back to their various jobs. One morning, soon after Jesus’ resurrection, the Apostles John, Peter, James, Thomas, Nathanael and two others were coming back from a long night of fishing with no catch of fish. Nearing the shore, they heard a man say, “Try throwing your nets out on the other side of the boat.” They did as he said and caught a great haul of fish. Because John’s heart was very near Jesus at all times, John recognized the stranger on the shore as being Jesus. He said to Peter, “It is the Lord!” John 21:2-7 This is a good example to the Christian, because if we are living close to the Lord, we will recognize when it is he calling to us and giving us instructions for our lives.
After these many opportunities of witnessing the resurrection of Jesus, the Apostles were ready to receive the Holy Spirit at Pentecost. John was with the other Apostles when the miracle of Pentecost occurred. Acts 2:5-7 One of the first recorded uses of the gifts of the spirit is shown in Acts 3:1-10 where Peter and John healed a lame man. This miracle provided two important lessons for John and Peter. First, they learned that the gift of healing provided an opportunity to witness to others about their Lord and his coming restitution of all things. Acts 3:11-26 Second, they learned that this would bring an opportunity to suffer with their master for bearing witness to the truth. Because of healing the lame man, they were persecuted by the religious rulers and thrown into prison. But the lame man was so thrilled by the experience that he went to prison with them to show support for these servants of the Lord. They could have become discouraged by their imprisonment, but instead, they saw even this as an opportunity to preach the good tidings of the coming kingdom! When all three were brought before the religious rulers, Peter and John spoke boldly for the truth. Acts 4:1-21 We should all look at our trying experiences in this way–as an opportunity to share the goodness of God to others.

After being imprisoned for the sake of Christ, John lived and preached in Judea, continuing to care for Jesus’ mother. John went on performing miracles to draw out a people for the name of Christ, even when the religious rulers told him not to do so. The Apostle Paul called John, James and Peter “pillars” of the Church and that these three would continue preaching to the Jews while he, Paul, would go the Gentiles. Gal. 2:9
Bible historians state that John moved to Ephesus, a city of Gentiles, just before the destruction of Jerusalem. There John preached until he was banished to the Island of Patmos around 90 A.D. This was a time of great persecution to the early church, and Patmos was a desolate island prison where many were sent as a result of their faithfulness to God. But, as before, John turned his imprisonment into an opportunity to glorify God. John could have said, “Oh, poor me! I’m on this lonely island with nothing to do.” But, no, he again rejoiced in the Lord for being able to experience the fellowship of Christ’s sufferings. And because of this positive attitude, God granted a most remarkable blessing, the vision seen in the last book of the Bible known as the Revelation of John.
When John was finally released from prison he lived out the rest of his life in Ephesus. John’s loving, yet strong nature made him useful in the Lord’s work. He is responsible, by the Lord’s Holy Spirit, for writing five books of the New Testament: the Gospel of John; the three letters of John to the Church; and Revelation. These inspired writings illustrate John’s wonderful example of Christlikeness. His humble spirit is displayed in Revelation 1:1 where John speaks of him-self as a servant of his master, Jesus. Because of John’s special vision, he could write with a deeper understanding of the Heavenly works of Jesus and their meaning to the Christian. All of John’s writings have this spiritual view of presenting the truth of Jesus’ life and teachings, whether it be the writings of deep symbolism in Revelation, the three letters of encouragement to the Church, or the Gospel of John which records the events of Jesus’ life. The other three Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke tell of Jesus’ earthly work. Reprint 1046
It is interesting to note that the Apostle John was the last Apostle to die, whereas his brother James was the first to die. Almost all of the Apostles met with violent deaths as a result of preaching the Gospel of Christ, but John died a natural death in Ephesus at the advanced age of around one hundred.
The Apostle John was certainly a wonderful example to all believers in Jesus. His life and writings prove to us that in all things, whether good or bad, we can rejoice if we look to the Lord for strength. The Apostle John was worthy to be called one of the Twelve Apostles of the Lamb.
You wrote: In fact, John was said to be the youngest of the Apostles of Jesus. John was a very humble man, and whenever he speaks of himself in his Gospel, he refers to himself as ” that disciple whom Jesus loved.” He didn’t want to be so bold as to say “I did this…”
Reply: The Biblical evidence of course presents a problem for this man-made tradition. First off since we see that John makes exactly this kind of declaration ( I saw this… ) mutiple times in the Book of Revelation we are confronted with Biblical evidence that shows the BEHAVIOR of John to be very different from the BEHAVIOR of the unnamed “disciple whom Jesus loved” that wrote the fourth gospel.
You cite verses in the fourth gospel (13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7,20) that NEVER MENTION JOHN and because some NON-BIBLE SOURCES claim this unnamed “other disciple” was John you are blind to the fact that you have comitted the logical fallacy of CIRCULAR REASONING — for since thses verses only mention the unnamed “other disciple” and they NEVER metion John.
Since there is NOT A SINGLE VERSE that would justify teaching this tradition, those who want to promote this idea simply parrot a list of verses which don’t even talk about John and pretend that they do — and hope that no one will ever search the scriptures to see if these things are so. [In fact the Biblical evidence proves that WHOEVER this unnamed disciple was he could not have been John.]
Take heed of Ps. 118:8!
http://www.TheDiscipleWhomJesusLoved.com is a free Bible study that cites nothing but the Bible in an effort to present the BIBLICAL evidence on this question in accordance with the admonition to “prove all things. Those who would like to see how the Bible disproves tradition (or how this tradition makes void the word of God) are invited to act as a jury and hear the facts that have been presereved for us in the Biblical record.
Comment by Jim — October 9, 2007 @ 10:38 am
Hi Jim
I did indeed spend one hour reading the information you presented.
What can I say? Historically and scripturally my references indicate that the premise is incorrect on a number of issues.
Let me just give one example of a logical alternative . Who was Mark? Luke describes him as “John who was surnamed Mark”. (Acts 12:12, ) He was not one of the twelve apostles, nor does it seem that he was a constant companion of Jesus. He is thought to be the young man Mark himself tells about at Mark 14:51, 52 ): “But a certain young man wearing a fine linen garment over his naked body began to follow [Jesus] nearby, and they tried to seize him, but he left his linen garment behind and got away.” It seems reasonable to conclude that this was Mark in view of the fact that Mark is the only writer who records this incident. And in leaving himself unidentified he would be following the example of others; Matthew doing the same at Matthew 9:10 and John, most likely, also at John 18:15.
You need to check dating and information contained within the writings of John to know that Lazarus could not have been the one whom Jesus used to love.
thanks
gw
Comment by GW staff — October 9, 2007 @ 11:12 am
Since your previous claim was so easily disproved by John’s words in the Book of Revelation, one would hope you would be more willing to search the scriptures but instead you decided to try a tactic that is typically used by those who want to cling to the John tradition, they try to change the subject — to get the focus off of the FACT that there is not even a single verse that would justify teaching the John idea.
If there was, of course, you would have cited it, and all the non-Bible sources that are used to prop-up the man-made John tradition would not be necessary. But rather than heed the Biblical admonition to “prove all things”, those who what to promote this tradition pretend that they can justify doing so by teaching against alternative ideas as to who this person was. Wrong. Got scripture? No you don’t.
The verses about the unnamed “other disciple” that you cited in your first post have everything to do with the unnamed “other disciple” and NOTHING to do with John — and the Biblical evidence proves this because the Biblical evidence proves that this person WHOEVER HE WAS could not have been John.
Either the FACTS that have been preserved for us in the Biblical record are true or the John tradition is true but they CANNOT both be true because the John idea would mean that the Bible contradicts itself and that is something that the truth cannot do. I’ll leave you to your tradition but those who might wonder why it is that defenders of the John tradition need to rely on non-Bible sources should try this:
SIMPLY READ THE FOURTH GOSPEL from the beginning with the honest question ‘who would I conclude that this author was BASED ON JUST THE FACTS IN THE GOSPEL ITSELF?’ If one does so they can NEVER come to the conclusion that this unnamed “other disciple” was John because NONE of the evidence in the fourth gospel points to John.
Comment by Jim — October 9, 2007 @ 9:22 pm